EPA Retracts CERCLA Remedy Selection Authority from Regional Offices for Remedies that Exceed $50 Million

Beveridge & Diamond PC
Pamela D. Marks, Steven M. Jawetz and Gayatri M. Patel

May 11, 2017

On May 9, 2017, EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt issued two new delegations under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund) that limit to the Administrator (and possibly the Deputy Administrator) the authority to select remedies estimated to cost over $50 million. One delegation concerns Superfund sites generally; the other relates to federal facilities. Previously, all remedy selection was delegated to the Assistant Administrator for Office of Land and Emergency Management and the Regional Administrators. The authority to sign Records of Decision estimated to cost less than $50 million remains with those officials. A copy of the revised delegations and accompanying memorandum are available here.

Continue Reading

Stormwater Runoff from Construction Activities Subject to New EPA 2017 General Permit

Spencer Fane LLP
Shelby Wood

March 12, 2017

Construction companies, general contractors, developers, and property owners involved in land clearance and disturbance activities will want to take note of the new Stormwater Construction General Permit (“Construction General Permit”) issued by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and effective on February 16, 2017. See 82 FR 6534 (January 19, 2017). As with earlier Construction General Permits, the 2017 permit applies to land clearance and disturbance activities greater that one acre and requires site operators to comply with best management practices (“BMPs”), effluent limits, and other permit requirements, including developing a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (“SWPPP”).

Continue Reading

Proposed Trump Budget Would Cut U.S. EPA Funding by Approximately 31%

Jenner & Block LLP
Steven M. Siros

March 16, 2017

On March 15, 2017, President Trump released his FY 2018 budget blueprint titled “America First—A Budget Blueprint to Make American Great Again.” In addition to increasing defense spending by $54 billion, the blueprint proposes a $2.7 billion budget reduction for U.S. EPA. Highlights of U.S. EPA’s proposed $5.7 billion budget include:

Continue Reading

Scott Pruitt Confirmed by Senate to Lead EPA

Jenner & Block LLP
Allison A. Torrence

February 17, 2017

Friday afternoon, Scott Pruitt was confirmed by the Senate to serve as the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 52 Senators voted for Mr. Pruitt’s confirmation, while 46 Senators voted against him. The vote was largely along party lines, with Democratic Senators Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota and Joe Manchin of West Virginia voting for Pruitt and Republican Susan Collins of Maine voting against him.

As we previously reported here, Mr. Pruitt has been the Attorney General of Oklahoma since his election to that post in 2011. As Oklahoma Attorney General, Mr. Pruitt has sued EPA numerous times to challenge EPA regulations, including current litigation over the Obama Administration’s Clean Power Plan. Oklahoma is part of the coalition of 28 states challenging EPA’s regulation of greenhouse gas emissions from existing power plants – a key component of the Clean Power Plan – in the case of West Virginia v. EPA, Case No. 15-1363. This case is currently pending in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

Continue Reading

Trump Administration Tells EPA to Freeze All Grants, Contracts

Synergy Environmental, Inc.
Brink Young

January 25, 2017

The Trump administration has instructed officials at the Environmental Protection Agency to freeze its grants and contracts. An email went out to employees in the agency’s Office of Acquisition Management within hours of President Trump’s swearing-in on Friday.

The future ramifications at this point are unclear. We will update you as soon as more information becomes available.

The Trump EPA – Some Things to Expect

Venable LLP
Kyle W. Robisch and Douglas H. Green

January 3, 2017

With just a few weeks before President-elect Trump’s inauguration, and his recent nomination of Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt—a leading critic and challenger of the Waters of the United States Rule (WOTUS Rule) and the Clean Power Plan (CPP)—as EPA Administrator, the era of the Trump EPA is set to begin. Much has already been written on some of the expected environmental policy changes under the Trump era EPA, such as attempting to dismantle the CCP, modifying the WOTUS Rule, and approving the Keystone XL pipeline.

Beyond these headline grabbing policy changes, however, are some other significant implications for the regulated community. Three areas of particular interest are the role of EPA initiated enforcement actions and citizen suits, opportunities to drive and shape EPA’s environmental priorities, and the future pace and substance of EPA’s implementation of the recent amendments to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).

Continue Reading

EPA Eases Path to Superfund Listing: Vapor Intrusion Component Added to the Hazardous Ranking System

Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Andrew H. Perellis, Kay R. Bonza and Craig B. Simonsen

December 9, 2016

Seyfarth Synopsis: With the EPA adding the consideration of vapor intrusion in its Superfund site investigations, hundreds of sites that previously would not rank high enough to qualify for listing on the National Priorities List of contaminated sites would now likely qualify.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has just released a pre-publication version of its final rule to add a subsurface intrusion (SsI) component to the Superfund Hazard Ranking System (HRS). EPA defines subsurface intrusion as the migration of hazardous substances, pollutants, and contaminants from the unsaturated zone or the surficial (shallow) ground water into overlying structures. The most common form of subsurface intrusion is vapor intrusion. Vapor intrusion occurs when vapor-forming chemicals from sources including dry cleaning solvents and industrial de-greasers in ground water or soil migrate into buildings and other enclosed spaces, posing a threat to indoor air quality.

We had blogged previously when the Agency proposed this new rule. See EPA Plans to Ease Path to Superfund Listing: Vapor Intrusion Component to be Added to the Hazardous Ranking System. Before this rulemaking, the EPA addressed SsI at sites only when those sites were listed on the National Priorities List (NPL) for another contamination issue. By adding the consideration of vapor intrusion to the HRS, hundreds of sites that previously would not rank high enough to qualify for listing on the NPL could now qualify based soley on the threat of vapor intrusion. NPL listing is a prerequisite to EPA spending sums over $2 million to investigate and conduct remedial actions under Superfund. NPL-listed sites are generally more expensive to remediate and more difficult to sell than are other environmentally distressed properties.

Continue Reading

EPA Proposes Prohibiting Use of TCE

Bergeson & Campbell PC
Lynn L. Bergeson, Charles M. Auer and Margaret R. Graham

December 8, 2016

On December 7, 2016, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced it would be issuing a rule proposing to prohibit the manufacture, processing, and distribution in commerce of trichloroethylene (TCE) for certain uses under Section 6 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), due to its determination that there are significant health risks associated with TCE use in aerosol degreasing and for spot cleaning in dry cleaning facilities. The proposed action is significant for several reasons, including that it represents the first use in a very long time of TSCA Section 6 as well as the first Section 6 control action taken under new TSCA. Specifically, EPA is proposing to prohibit the use of TCE in “aerosol degreasing and for use in spot cleaning in dry cleaning facilities; to prohibit commercial use of TCE for aerosol degreasing and for spot cleaning in dry cleaning facilities; to require manufacturers, processors, and distributors, except for retailers of TCE for any use, to provide downstream notification of these prohibitions throughout the supply chain; and to require limited recordkeeping.” We look forward to a close reading of the proposed rule and to evaluating the arguments, the policy points, and the evidence provided by EPA to satisfy the various legal requirements, including those under Section 6(c) and Section 26.

Continue Reading

Is Your Waste Coming or Going? EPA Revises Hazardous Waste Export-Import Rules and Reforms Generator Rules

Pierce Atwood LLP
Lisa A. Gilbreath and Kenneth F. Gray

November 15, 2016

In late October 2016, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) adopted two final rules that will very shortly change procedures for those who export or import Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) hazardous waste and – in the long run – allow important changes for hazardous waste generator management practices.

First, EPA finalized significant revisions to RCRA hazardous waste export-import regulations. These revisions are generally consistent with EPA’s 2015 proposed rule and implement the more stringent transboundary shipment rules of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. The rules provide one consolidated and streamlined set of requirements applying to all exports and imports, some of which are effective at the end of December.

In general, the revisions affect four groups: (1) all persons who export or import (or arrange for the export or import of) hazardous waste for recycling or disposal, including universal waste; (2) all facilities that receive imports of such hazardous wastes for recycling or disposal; (3) all persons who export, or arrange for the export of, conditionally excluded cathode ray tubes being shipped for recycling; and (4) all persons who transport any export and import shipments.

Continue Reading

“Oh The Times . . . They are A-Changing:” EPA & DOJ Follow Through on Worker Endangerment Initiative

Beveridge & Diamond PC
Peter C. Anderson and Stephen M. Richmond

October 19, 2016

On October 12, 2016, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced that four Texas companies agreed to plead guilty to criminal violations of the Clean Air Act at oil and chemical processing facilities, and to collectively pay $3.5 million in fines to the government. While Clean Air Act criminal prosecutions are no longer rare events, and the total fines imposed set no new records, these cases are noteworthy for three critical reasons:

  1. they confirm DOJ’s commitment to pursue the previously-announced Worker Endangerment Initiative;
  2. they demonstrate the ability of OSHA and EPA to coordinate on significant enforcement cases; and
  3. they reveal certain threshold factors that may trigger a criminal investigative response.

    I. The Worker Endangerment Initiative

Continue Reading